patents

4 01, 2020

Patent Eligibility of a Gaming Machine

By |2020-03-08T13:04:14+00:00January 4th, 2020|patents|Comments Off on Patent Eligibility of a Gaming Machine

In a November 22, 2019, decision (Ex Parte Berndt Burghard, Appeal No. 2018-001861), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board reversed the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-20 as being directed to patent ineligible subject matter under 35 [...]

18 10, 2019

Time Limits for filing Inter Partes Patent Review Requests

By |2020-02-19T13:09:04+00:00October 18th, 2019|patents|Comments Off on Time Limits for filing Inter Partes Patent Review Requests

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued two precedential opinions relating to the time for filing petitions for inter partes patent reviews. While the AIA permits challengers to file a request for inter partes review of [...]

18 10, 2019

October 2019 USPTO Update on Subject Matter Eligibility

By |2020-02-19T13:09:14+00:00October 18th, 2019|patents|Comments Off on October 2019 USPTO Update on Subject Matter Eligibility

The USPTO published an October 17, 2019 Update on Subject Matter Eligibility. The Update follows up on the Patent Eligibility Guidance (PEG) the USPTO published in January 2019. The Update uses further explanation and examples to focus [...]

29 08, 2019

Claim Interpretation and Motions Raising Section 101 Invalidity

By |2020-02-19T13:09:25+00:00August 29th, 2019|patents|Comments Off on Claim Interpretation and Motions Raising Section 101 Invalidity

Patent infringement defendants often file a motion for judgment on the pleadings (under FRCP 12(c)) or a motion for summary judgment (under FRCP 56) early in the case – often before discovery or even a Markman [...]

12 08, 2019

Federal Circuit Remands PTAB Decision on Public Accessability of Prior Art

By |2020-02-19T13:09:35+00:00August 12th, 2019|patents|Comments Off on Federal Circuit Remands PTAB Decision on Public Accessability of Prior Art

In Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd v. Infobridge PTE Ltd., (Fed. Cir. July 12, 2019) the Federal Circuit found that the PTAB applied the wrong legal standard for determining whether a reference was publicly accessible before a critical [...]

6 08, 2019

Design Patents: “Aesthetic Functionality” and the Repair Doctrine

By |2020-02-19T13:09:51+00:00August 6th, 2019|patents|Comments Off on Design Patents: “Aesthetic Functionality” and the Repair Doctrine

In the case of Automotive Body Parts Association v. Ford Global Technologies, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was asked to consider whether certain design patents owned by Ford are invalid on the grounds of [...]

11 07, 2019

Practice Tip: Limitations Upon Patent Challenges in Licenses and Other Contracts

By |2020-02-19T13:10:11+00:00July 11th, 2019|patents|Comments Off on Practice Tip: Limitations Upon Patent Challenges in Licenses and Other Contracts

Patent challengers have a number of mechanisms to challenge the validity of a patent. The American Invents Act of 2011 overhauled the U.S. Patent system and established three types of administrative review proceedings before the Patent Trial [...]

27 06, 2019

State Owned Patents Not Immune from IPR Proceedings

By |2020-02-19T13:10:21+00:00June 27th, 2019|patents|Comments Off on State Owned Patents Not Immune from IPR Proceedings

States, such as through state universities, often own patents. Typically, state sovereign immunity shields a state from being sued by private parties, such as in a lawsuit brought by a party seeking declaratory judgement that the state-owned [...]

Go to Top