trademarks

30 07, 2020

PRECLUSION OF DEFENSES BASED UPON EARLIER LITIGATION

By |2020-08-30T16:10:43+00:00July 30th, 2020|trademarks|Comments Off on PRECLUSION OF DEFENSES BASED UPON EARLIER LITIGATION

In a trademark dispute between Lucky Brand Dungarees and Marcel Fashion Group, the U.S. Supreme Court had the opportunity to determine when a party is precluded from raising a defense raised in an earlier litigation between [...]

23 04, 2020

No Requirement to File for a Trademark Registration Before Using a Trademark

By |2020-04-23T11:10:59+00:00April 23rd, 2020|trademarks|Comments Off on No Requirement to File for a Trademark Registration Before Using a Trademark

We’ve fielded many inquiries from businesses and brand developers, asking: do we need to file for trademark registration before we use the “brand” or “logo” that we are hoping to trademark? The answer, at least for trademarks, [...]

22 04, 2020

Moral Rights in Graffiti Art

By |2020-04-22T11:49:59+00:00April 22nd, 2020|copyright, trademarks|Comments Off on Moral Rights in Graffiti Art

Do artists have rights in artworks that they have sold to others? France, Germany, and other European nations have long recognized that artists, including specifically visual artists, would retain “moral rights” in the artist’s work, impacting the [...]

15 04, 2020

Color Marks can be Inherently Distinctive When Used on Product Packaging

By |2020-04-22T11:49:21+00:00April 15th, 2020|trademarks|Comments Off on Color Marks can be Inherently Distinctive When Used on Product Packaging

In order for a trademark to be protectable, it must be distinctive, either by being inherently distinctive or by acquiring distinctiveness (often referred to as “secondary meaning”). In the case of Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, [...]

26 07, 2019

U.S. SUPREME COURT OPINES ON “IMMORAL AND SCANDALOUS” TRADEMARKS

By |2020-02-19T13:10:01+00:00July 26th, 2019|trademarks|Comments Off on U.S. SUPREME COURT OPINES ON “IMMORAL AND SCANDALOUS” TRADEMARKS

The United States Supreme Court recently issued a decision on whether “immoral or scandalous” trademarks could properly be barred under the Lanham Act’s express provisions against such marks. In its decision for In Re Brunetti (June [...]

Go to Top